Teh need for copyedotirs–that is, the need for copyeditors

“Doris Truong, a multiplatform editor on the Universal News Desk at [the] Washington Post, was named the eighth winner of the American Copy Editors Society’s Robinson Prize during the national conference banquet Friday, April 5, in St. Louis,” according to the society’s website.

The day before, during (I assume) her absence from work, the Post website’s front page ran this headline for an upcoming chat: “Brad Hirschfield: Thanking God in Pubic Speeches.” As Dave Barry used to write, I am not making this up.

Would Ms. Truong have caught that? Is the website even in her domain? It should be in somebody’s. I understand the need, the need for speed, online (see “Should blog posts be edited?” two posts ago), but somebody has got to be second eyes at the very least. Why? Because everyone makes misteaks. Even—gasp—editors.

The irony here is too good to pass up, but the overall problem is sadly common. Former Post copyeditor Pat Myers had a conversation the other day on the aptly named Style Conversational blog that started with this question from a miffed reader about a different error: “Can’t the Post afford a preafrooder?” Excerpts follow (all sic):

—Someone at TWP got the massage. It’s gone from fuxed to fixed.

—[Another recent column read,] “The awe and wonder that accompanied Harper at 19 hasn’t abetted at 20.”

—I see so many errors in the online Post that I’ve started sighing and moving on. If I had my druthers, nothing would go out—in print or in bytes—without a copy editor eyeballing it first. But I have resigned myself to the temporal imperative of online journalism.

—[Pat:] I’d like to get the egregious errors fixed if possible. I don’t mean typos as much as ones that at least appear as errors of ignorance—ones where it looks as if the person didn’t know the right word (though if you’re anything like me, inadvertently typing a homophone of the correct word is becoming a more and more frequent occurrence).

—I acknowledge and applaud your desire to minimize TWP’s instances of egregious buffoonery.

Is there any more egregious buffoonery than “pubic affairs” and the like? But maybe I’m beating up on my hometown paper too much. Let’s run an experiment, a look at the online front pages of five U.S. newspapers, and see what shows up …

New York Times. The word “donuts.” I don’t know the paper’s style guide, so maybe that’s kosher, so to speak. Same for a few headlines I would have fixed, such as “Wearing a Badge, and a Video Camera” and “Slaking Region’s Thirst, and Cleaning Its Beaches.” “Scuttlebot,” in a technology headline, appears to be a pun. First (and seemingly only) mistake: “At Home With Jill Mccorkle.” A look at the story shows that her name is McCorkle.

Boston Globe. “Treasury head visiting Europe, to stress growth.” I guess the comma is there to show that these are separate ideas, not one. “Career-defining moments of three top women executives.” Agh, “women” is not an adjective! But that’s widely accepted these days. First mistake: “Thrown by plot in ‘Game of ‘Thrones.’ ” Possible mistake: “Understanding the hopes, fears, disappointments, and dreams of patients can make better doctors in the process.” Newspapers usually avoid the serial comma, but I can’t see enough evidence before the paywall to decide whether this is the Globe’s rule.

Chicago Sun-Times. First mistakes: “Fans, friend and family of Roger Ebert streamed into Holy Name Cathedral Monday morning to share their memories and love of the film critic at his funeral mass.” Roger had far more than one friend, and “Mass” is a proper noun. “Chicago Police program protects kids targeted with gang violence.” I believe that should be “by,” not “with.” Pet peeve: “Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher dead at 87.” This is correct according to AP, but Washingtonian and I say “prime minister” should not be capped after “former.” “View point: Wrigley Field rooftop owners were there first.” “View point,” two words?

Miami Herald. First mistake: “Mayoral candidate says someone is using Vodou on her.” AP, at least last year’s version, says the spelling is “Voodoo” (except lowercase for a use like “voodoo economics”). Maybe the Herald, understandably, has its own preference—but regardless, the mistake is either here or in a subhead, “The case of a vodou curse, drugs and rape heads to trial,” because either up or down is right. Pet peeve: “Water pressure impacted in Northwest Miami-Dade due to repairs.” Teeth are impacted; the water pressure is affected.

Los Angeles Times. Questionable use: “Goodwill, other nonprofits fight over used clothing.” The mental image alone is enough to suggest a rewrite. Correct use (yay): “Margaret Thatcher, Britain’s first female prime minister, dies at 87.” First three mistakes: “Closing Arguments Set in fake Rockefeller?s Murder Trial,” “Autopsy Underway for Pastor Rick Warren?s Son,” “Annette Funicello, Former Mousketeer, Dies at 70.” (The Times apparently uses a mix of u&lc for heads, depending on the section.)

And just for kicks, today’s Poughkeepsie Journal, the paper I grew up with. First mistake: “Margaret Thatcher, ‘The Iron Lady’ dies of a stroke at age 87.” “Army: No improper relationship for West Point head.” “By” would be better than “for”; this headline sounds like he’s not allocated one. “Philip Levine Poet Laureate of the US to Read at Storm King Art Center.” Commas, anyone? But here’s a whopper: The story itself informs us that he was poet laureate in the year 201112. (The story has so many typos that I wonder if part of the problem is transmission/formatting.) “Traffic, news, gas prices, lifestyle and things-to-do for those people who travel to get to work.” Maybe all those missing commas morphed into hyphens.

Now, this may not be a useful experiment so late in the day, when one hopes mistakes have been discovered and corrected. Also, there are probably a lot more and worse mistakes in stories than in front-page headlines. But there’s a big difference between a simple typo and, as Pat said, the sort of error that suggests ignorance or laziness on one or more people’s part. A misplaced punctuation mark is one thing; factual errors and bad grammar are another.

To clarify: I’m not so worried about typos, even worse ones than those noted here. But the bigger stuff—the stuff that makes journalists and newspapers look bad and depletes readers’ trust and faith—has to be fixed. Preferably before it gets into print.

I showed Pat the screen shot I took of last week’s Brad Hirschfield headline and the further mistake below it (“What do you think about public figures address God in public speeches?”). She replied, “I guess it’ll take a really damaging error before they decide it’s worth hiring more people, or slowing down the process, to have a cleaner page.” As Hirschfield might say, “God forbid.”

Copyright 2013 Ellen M. Ryan. All rights reserved.

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: